Zootopia Might Not Take The Political Stance That You Think It Does.

  • In this movie the police heroes abuse their power routinely, bunny threatens to falsely testify against fox, and this is hunky dory.  And even together with the mafia, our “heroes” threaten someone with death to get the answers they want (or is it just Waterboarding, not lethal? Whatever).  No way that could go wrong!  What is this, 24 with Jack Bauer?
  • Two opposing government conspiracies in the same story?  Yet, somehow, both conspiracies seem to point in the same direction:  in our real world, both of them are the kinds of conspiracy theories that paranoid anti-social-justice people would believe in:
    • 1) people hide evidence of biological differences, even when they are dangerous
    • 2) people falsely create evidence of oppression by using False Flag Operations, to gain power!

      Hmm.

Though that doesn’t mean we should cheer for the villain.  Using False Flag Operations is still villainy that we should despise.  And, as the main character does, we should strive for some kind of harmony (something like Meta-Utopia is one way to do that) even if there were extreme biological differences, and even if there are a few dangerous people in a group.

It’s a bit of a mixed bag.  Some of those issues are only troubling because of the real world context we find ourselves in.

A few personal notes:

  • disappointed it was all mammals!  I wanted reptiles and such!
  • The different climates in Zootopia reminded me of a Meta-Utopia!  🙂
  • The movie suffers from Convoluted Blockbuster Syndrome.

Other points to maybe consider:

  • “kid fox wants to be an elephant” seems very pointed at transness.  Though (somewhat realistically) it turns out to be a “troll”, not sincere.
  • The main theme is bunny’s dreams/aspiorations I guess.  For a while, that was captivating me a bit, since that tension between hope for dreams and despair is where I find myself a lot.  But the movie just seems to say “Lean In!” I think?
  • And those damn cell phone apps these days!  Making the police front desk person distracted, har har.
  • And I was even put a bit off by how extremely they portrayed the hippie guy at the nudist place.  Gotta put LOTS AND LOTS of flies around his hair!  Make sure everyone feels that CRINGE!
  • a plant-based chemical turns normal people into savages.  Reefer Madness!  We also see them growing it in a secret drug lab.
  • The pro-tolerance protests started by the celebrity singer seem to run counter to reason, because aren’t the facts clear that there is a SUDDEN EPIDEMIC that is hurting prey?  I guess you could argue that the epidemic is still statistically very small, maybe not worthy of such concern?
  • the fox gets flashbacks to his childhood trauma (of being treated like a dangerous savage when he wasn’t) while looking at images of an animal that actually was dangerous and savage
  • does it make sense that both meanings of the clue “night howlers” turn out to be “correct”?  What are the odds?
  • When “biology” is used as an explanation, it’s set up as a plausible explanation that the audience should at least consider (and the one who seems incredulous at first is a huge lion authority figure who is at that moment using his physical intimidation to silence the biology hypothesis, clearly the audience is supposed to be against him).  Remember, inner biological instincts were mentioned in the opening exposition of the movie.*  If they wanted us to think that Judy was jumping to conclusions based on prejudice, not science, they should have made it clear before she said it.

*It almost seems like this facet of the story is crafted precisely as a thought experiment.  It’s like the writers are using the method that the main character from “The Illusionist” uses when getting the authority guy to try to lift the sword.  They hold it just long enough to get people watching the movie uncomfortable, then let it go.  I don’t think I have fully grasped the meaning produced by this in relation to everything else yet.

Advertisements

More Plot Without Conflict

There’s an art blog called still eating oranges and they made a fairly popular post called The significance of plot without conflict.

While unfortunately that post seems to mix up plot and narrative structure (or even a revealing of information), maybe the idea they talked about can be applied to either.

Anyways, here’s another very basic plot that has no conflict:  someone has a desire, and so that person takes an action to satisfy that desire.

You may not realize it, but this simple plot is very popular.

Where, you ask?  The porn industry!  The desire is “to have sex” and this causes the characters to have sex.  This is a logical cause and effect, a plot.  Though, of course, plenty of porn films have plots that are different from this.

Inland Empire

The movie Inland Empire seems to be difficult for people to understand, but I have a lot of ideas about it.

[Lots of Spoilers!]

Most of it might be just an imagined worst-case-scenario that the frightened and distrought Lost Girl has running through her head during the night.

The vast majority of the film is not an objective perspective.  That Lost Girl scene might be, and I also think a few other small scenes are fairly close as well.  For instance, when the pregnancy is announced when they are sitting at the table.

One large arc of the story is “the secret”, and that’s mostly what I’ll talk about today.  We first hear of it near the start when the rabbit says he has a secret.  In my opinion, his entrance into the sitcom accompanied by bizarre cheering represents the decision to create the secret.  I think this is the Lost Girl’s decision.

Soon after this, the new neighbour visits Nikki.  I think Nikki here may be the mind of the Lost Girl (or part of it), and the visitor represents another part of the mind of the Lost Girl, she could be the troublesome thoughts about the situation that she is being confronted with.  She lives in the small woods, it’s difficult to see her house from the road, therefore she is related to the secret.

“Not through the market, but through the alleyway behind the market.  This is the way to the palace.”

She parks in the alley because there’s always parking there.  Then she sees the sign Axxon N, and begins remembering something.  Information that she had chosen to hide from herself, purposefully.  (the secret)

But she finds out the secret.  Was she, in fact, seeing another man?  Yes.  Though for a while she didn’t know which came before and which came after:  the need to screw people for money (she needed to because she was pregnant), or her infidelity.  But her husband knows for a fact that he cannot father children.  So it was her infidelity which came first.

She sees Axxon N and she finds out the secret.  She says “I’m a whore” and then mocks her methods of fooling herself (“Where was I?”).

This underhanded way of making money (trying to get to “the palace”, or to Inland Empire) is called “going through the alleyway”.  And recall that scene in the woods, her husband was unfairly abandoned by someone who left for Inland Empire.  It was her.  She realizes this and perceives herself as villainous (represented by her slow nightmarish run towards the camera with the jumpscare closeup, then it cuts to a scene of her face shocked by seeing this).  She surpressed reality, was hypnotized by the Phantom as well, and this came back to hurt her (stab her in the gut).

There’s more I could go into, but that’s enough rambling for today.